Suppose some proportion of the population engages in a socially undesirable activity—say, evading taxes. We want to estimate , but can’t ask people directly because they may fear penalities from incriminating themselves.
One solution to this problem is as follows. Choose another characteristic that people don’t mind reporting and for which we know the population prevalence—say, whether they are right-handed. Let be the (assumedly known) proportion of the population with this characteristic. Sample people, and give them the following instructions:
Flip a fair coin, but don’t tell me what you get. If you get heads, answer the question “do you evade taxes?” If you get tails, answer the question “are you right-handed?”
The coin toss outcome’s unobservability shields respondents’ revelation of tax evasion—they could be responding “Yes” to the question of whether they are right-handed. This shield, hopefully, elicits truthful reporting. Then, by the Law of Total Probability, the probability that someone responds “Yes” is Let be the number of people who respond “Yes.” Then is Binomially distributed with trials and success rate , and so has mean and variance . Consequently, the estimator of has mean and variance since for any . Thus, is an unbiased estimator of and becomes more precise as the sample size grows. We can quantify this precision using Chebyshev’s inequality: for any , we have and therefore Thus, for example, choosing guarantees that differs from by no more than with probability 0.9.